not all students learn the same way


Meanwhile, the teacher, Julie Phang does not see anything wrong about her, teaching methods. There is no body of literature or any research that establishes that all children can learn the basic curriculum at the same time and at the same level. 1. The online curriculum addresses all the different ways my children learn best, which can vary by subject — visual, auditory, physical, and more. Besides, for each peer reviewed paper there’s one or several peer reviewed papers that attack it. But the range that is normal for walking is 8-3/4 months all the way to 17 months. I like a teacher who gives you something to take home to think about besides homework. ‘All learning has an emotional base.’ –Plato. If you choose to homeschool your children, you have a great opportunity to give your children the individualized attention they need as they’re learning. While we might agree that every American eight-year-old should be able to read and multiply, beyond those basics, there are few reasons to make every student follow the same path. First of all,there are several approaches and disciplines that contribute to learning science, and it’s reductionistic to think that neuroscience is the be all end all in our understanding of the learning process (though, of course, many neuroscientists do). Here are four key ideas. Visit the Web site of the Education Trust, an advocacy group based in Washington, DC, to learn about schools and school districts that have increased the performance of students many others claim to be hard to teach. However, she said nothing to diminish or refute his. While there are different learning styles, your student will likely favor several styles and not just one. After more than a decade of working with kids with dyslexia, I have found that no two students learn the same way. The same applies for reading. Do all children learn with the same teaching procedures? It’s also been thoroughly debunked. “Thus, culturally relevant teaching requires that teachers attend to students’, academic needs, not merely make them “feel good”. A high school teacher who works with English Language Learners writes, 'Of course my kids can be assessed. Try our expert-verified textbook solutions with step-by-step explanations. Oyewumi Zaccheus Opeyemi et.al. Logical (Mathematical) – using logical reasoning and drawing associations works best for these people. These people respond best to images, mind maps, flow charts and other methods for visualizing new concepts. 6. Contemporary researchers agree that we don’t all learn in the same way, but at the same time maintain that our interests and preferences have more to do with how we retain new information than an inborn learning style. Some students learn concepts easily the first time around, while others require more time and attention. They benefit from self-paced courses and are very focused on their internal feelings and personal associations. - William G. Spady Visual (Spatial) – learners prefer to use images and spatial orientation to acquire new material. I find this genre of “myth-busting” popular science books doing more harm than good. In the early 1980s, Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences took the educational world by storm. 7. Another might be intellectually adept but less able to express that power in a timed, carefully … Perception of Nursing Students Towards Online Learning: A case Study of Lautech Open and Distance Learning Centre, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria Supporters of the learning styles theory have been able to isolate 7 main modes of learning that supposedly ease the instruction process for students if the right approach is applied. Visual learners. Criticism of learning styles being the main obstacle to achieving better learning outcomes, however, is not scarce. John Katzman Quotes. Papers in peer reviewed journals are a dime-a-dozen. This comes in handy when designing a new e-learning program by bringing diversity and versatility to teaching techniques and creating richer, more memorable learning experiences. It would be like a neo-liberal economist labelling Keynesian economics a “myth”.